2.00 ct Radiant Laboratory-Grown Diamond

What reads well

• A 1.41:1 length-to-width ratio sits in the classic radiant range.
• Face-up spread (8.67 × 6.13 mm) is typical or better for a 2.00 ct radiant.
• Excellent polish and symmetry, the top finish grades.
• F color is in the colorless range.
• VVS1 clarity: inclusions are not a practical visual factor.

What deserves a closer look

• The table 73% sits outside the typical radiant range.
• Thick to very thick girdle: a thick girdle carries hidden weight and can reduce face-up size (thicker points are common in fancy shapes).
• Screening only: for this radiant, check images or video of the exact stone for the sparkle pattern (defined flashes or "crushed ice") and any dark or see-through corners.
• Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

The reading, field by field

Table · Closer look

A 73% table is larger than typical for a radiant (60–70%). Large tables can read bright but flatter, with less fire and contrast.

Total depth · Closer look

69.3% is deeper than typical for a radiant (61–68%). Extra depth holds weight below the girdle, so the stone can face up smaller than its carat weight suggests.

Length-to-width · Ideal

A 1.41:1 outline is within the classic 1.2–1.5:1 range for a radiant.

Polish · Ideal

Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.

Symmetry · Ideal

Excellent symmetry is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.

Girdle · Closer look

Thick to very thick: a thick girdle carries weight in the rim, so the stone can face up a little smaller for its carat weight. It is durable, though.

Culet · Ideal

Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.

Color · Ideal

F is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.

Clarity · Ideal

VVS1: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.

Fluorescence · Ideal

None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

What to check on the exact stone

• With 69.3% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 2.00 ct radiant?
• Does the large table look bright but flat, with less colored fire than you expected?
• Is extra carat weight trapped in the thick girdle rim where it does not add finger presence?
• Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?

Report facts

Origin

Laboratory-grown

Carat

2.00 ct

Shape

Radiant

Cut grade

Not given for this shape

Color

F

Clarity

VVS1

Measurements

8.67 × 6.13 × 4.25 mm

Table

73%

Total depth

69.3%

Crown angle

Not given for this shape

Pavilion angle

Not given for this shape

Polish

Excellent

Symmetry

Excellent

Girdle

Thick to very thick

Culet

Pointed

Fluorescence

None