IGI report LG818661112

2.00 ct Pear Laboratory-Grown Diamond

87/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

Screening only: for this pear, check images or video of the exact stone for the bow-tie, even shoulders and a point that lines up with the centre of the rounded end.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Closer look: A 64% table is larger than typical for a pear (53–63%). Large tables can read bright but flatter, with less fire and contrast.
Total depth · Closer look: 57.2% is shallower than typical for a pear (58–64%). That spreads the stone face-up but raises the risk of windowing — a glassy, see-through center.
Length-to-width · Ideal: A 1.54:1 outline is within the classic 1.45–1.75:1 range for a pear.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Ideal: Excellent symmetry is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium to slightly thick (faceted): a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Favorable: G is near-colorless and faces up white in most settings, though a pear can show a hint of warmth at the point.
Clarity · Ideal: VVS2: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

With a shallow 57.2% depth, can you see a glassy, see-through patch in the center?
Does the large table look bright but flat, with less colored fire than you expected?
In a face-up video, does the bow-tie flicker as the stone tilts, or stay a fixed dark band across the center?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?