IGI report LG790680004

3.00 ct Radiant Laboratory-Grown Diamond

88/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

The table 72% sits outside the typical radiant range.
G color in a 3.00 ct radiant may show some warmth, especially at the corners.
Screening only: for this radiant, check images or video of the exact stone for the sparkle pattern (defined flashes or "crushed ice") and any dark or see-through corners.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Closer look: A 72% table is larger than typical for a radiant (60–70%). Large tables can read bright but flatter, with less fire and contrast.
Total depth · Ideal: 66.1% is within the typical 61–68% range for a radiant, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
Length-to-width · Ideal: A 1.43:1 outline is within the classic 1.2–1.5:1 range for a radiant.
Polish · Favorable: Very Good polish is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Symmetry · Favorable: Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium to slightly thick: a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Favorable: G is near-colorless and faces up white in most settings, though a radiant can show a hint of warmth at the corners.
Clarity · Favorable: VS1 is typically eye-clean.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

Does the large table look bright but flat, with less colored fire than you expected?
Does this CVD diamond show any brown or gray undertone face-up in daylight?
With Very Good polish and Very Good symmetry, are there visible misaligned facets or wheel marks?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?