IGI report LG788669211

2.26 ct Hexagon Laboratory-Grown Diamond

82/100 · Considered

A balanced profile with a few questions to carry forward.

What reads well

The table 67% sits outside the typical fancy shape range.
Screening only: for this fancy shape, check images or video of the exact stone for the overall light pattern, dark areas and any see-through window.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.
The shape "Hexagonal Modified Brilliant" does not match a standard profile, so a conservative general screen was used.

Table · Closer look: A 67% table is larger than typical for a fancy shape (55–65%). Large tables can read bright but flatter, with less fire and contrast.
Total depth · Closer look: 68.2% is deeper than typical for a fancy shape (58–68%). Extra depth holds weight below the girdle, so the stone can face up smaller than its carat weight suggests.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Ideal: Excellent symmetry is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium: a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Ideal: E is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Ideal: VVS2: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

With 68.2% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 2.26 ct hexagon?
Does the large table look bright but flat, with less colored fire than you expected?
Does this CVD diamond show any brown or gray undertone face-up in daylight?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?