IGI report LG788669086

2.00 ct Cushion Laboratory-Grown Diamond

88/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

A 1.40:1 length-to-width ratio is outside the classic cushion range; the outline will look more elongated than typical.
Screening only: for this cushion, check images or video of the exact stone for the facet pattern (bold, chunky flashes or finer "crushed ice") and any dark areas under the table.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Ideal: At 66%, the table sits within the typical 56–66% range for a cushion, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Ideal: 67.4% is within the typical 61–69% range for a cushion, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
Length-to-width · Favorable: A 1.4:1 outline is longer and slimmer than the classic 1–1.35:1 range for a cushion — a matter of taste, but worth seeing in person.
Polish · Favorable: Very Good polish is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Symmetry · Favorable: Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Girdle · Ideal: Thin To Slightly Thick (Faceted): a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Ideal: F is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Favorable: VS1 is typically eye-clean.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

Does this cushion produce broad, chunky flashes or small needle-like crushed-ice sparkle?
Does this CVD diamond show any brown or gray undertone face-up in daylight?
With Very Good polish and Very Good symmetry, are there visible misaligned facets or wheel marks?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?