IGI report LG784685731

2.50 ct Round Brilliant Laboratory-Grown Diamond

90/100 · Refined

A strong, composed candidate on paper.

What reads well

Depth 63.3% sits outside the preferred round range.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Ideal: At 56%, the table sits within the typical 53–59% range for a round brilliant, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Closer look: 63.3% is deeper than typical for a round brilliant (59.5–63%). Extra depth holds weight below the girdle, so the stone can face up smaller than its carat weight suggests.
Crown angle · Ideal: 35.7° sits in the 32–36° zone where crown angles typically balance fire and brightness.
Pavilion angle · Ideal: 41° is inside the narrow 40.5–41.3° zone where the pavilion returns light most efficiently.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Ideal: Excellent symmetry is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium To Slightly Thick (Faceted): a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Ideal: D is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Ideal: VVS2: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.
Cut grade · Ideal: Excellent as issued by IGI, on IGI's own scale. The measured proportions above tell you more than the label.

With 63.3% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 2.50 ct round?
Does this CVD diamond show any brown or gray undertone face-up in daylight?
Can I see this stone in soft daylight away from store spotlights to verify its sparkle?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?