IGI report LG781638017

1.54 ct Pear Laboratory-Grown Diamond

88/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

A 65% depth is on the deep side for a pear; deeper pavilions are associated with a stronger bow-tie and hidden weight.
Screening only: for this pear, check images or video of the exact stone for the bow-tie, even shoulders and a point that lines up with the centre of the rounded end.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Ideal: At 63%, the table sits within the typical 53–63% range for a pear, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Closer look: 65% is deeper than typical for a pear (58–64%). Extra depth holds weight below the girdle, so the stone can face up smaller than its carat weight suggests and may show a stronger bow-tie.
Length-to-width · Ideal: A 1.68:1 outline is within the classic 1.45–1.75:1 range for a pear.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Favorable: Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium to slightly thick (faceted): a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Ideal: D is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Favorable: VS1 is typically eye-clean.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

With 65% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 1.54 ct pear?
In a face-up video, does the bow-tie flicker as the stone tilts, or stay a fixed dark band across the center?
Will the ring setting use a protective V-tip prong or bezel to safeguard the delicate point?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?