IGI report LG769627982

1.49 ct Heart Laboratory-Grown Diamond

89/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

The stated 59.4% depth does not match the measurements (about 64.6%). Check the report data.
Thick to very thick girdle: a thick girdle carries hidden weight and can reduce face-up size (thicker points are common in fancy shapes).
Screening only: for this heart, check images or video of the exact stone for even lobes, a crisp cleft and a point that lines up below it.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Ideal: At 62%, the table sits within the typical 53–63% range for a heart, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Ideal: 59.4% is within the typical 56–63% range for a heart, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
Length-to-width · Ideal: A 1.09:1 outline is within the classic 0.9–1.1:1 range for a heart.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Ideal: Excellent symmetry is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Girdle · Closer look: Thick to very thick (faceted): a thick girdle carries weight in the rim, so the stone can face up a little smaller for its carat weight. It is durable, though.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Ideal: F is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Ideal: VVS2: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

Is extra carat weight trapped in the thick girdle rim where it does not add finger presence?
Does this CVD diamond show any brown or gray undertone face-up in daylight?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?