IGI report LG766624993

2.01 ct Round Brilliant Laboratory-Grown Diamond

88/100 · Refined

A strong, composed candidate on paper.

What reads well

Crown 33.6° / pavilion 40.2° fall outside the pairing zone associated with strong light return.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Ideal: At 59%, the table sits within the typical 53–59% range for a round brilliant, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Ideal: 61% is within the typical 59.5–63% range for a round brilliant, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
Crown angle · Ideal: 33.6° sits in the 32–36° zone where crown angles typically balance fire and brightness.
Pavilion angle · Closer look: 40.2° is shallower than the narrow 40.5–41.3° zone. Shallow pavilions can let light pass straight through, looking glassy.
Polish · Favorable: Very Good polish is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Symmetry · Favorable: Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Girdle · Favorable: Medium to thick (faceted): durable, on the thicker side for a round brilliant, so a little weight sits in the rim.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Ideal: D is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Favorable: VS1 is typically eye-clean.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.
Cut grade · Favorable: Very Good as issued by IGI, on IGI's own scale. The measured proportions above tell you more than the label.

Does a gray ring or glassy patch show around the center when you look straight down?
Does this CVD diamond show any brown or gray undertone face-up in daylight?
With Very Good polish and Very Good symmetry, are there visible misaligned facets or wheel marks?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?