IGI report LG762569444

2.00 ct Heart Laboratory-Grown Diamond

88/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

The stated 58.2% depth does not match the measurements (about 69%). Check the report data.
A 0.84:1 length-to-width ratio is outside the classic heart range; the outline will look more compact than typical.
The table 65% sits outside the typical heart range.
Screening only: for this heart, check images or video of the exact stone for even lobes, a crisp cleft and a point that lines up below it.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Closer look: A 65% table is larger than typical for a heart (53–63%). Large tables can read bright but flatter, with less fire and contrast.
Total depth · Ideal: 58.2% is within the typical 56–63% range for a heart, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
Length-to-width · Favorable: A 1.19:1 outline is longer and slimmer than the classic 0.9–1.1:1 range for a heart — a matter of taste, but worth seeing in person.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Ideal: Excellent symmetry is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Girdle · Ideal: Slightly thick to thick (faceted): a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Ideal: D is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Favorable: VS1 is typically eye-clean.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

Does the large table look bright but flat, with less colored fire than you expected?
Does this CVD diamond show any brown or gray undertone face-up in daylight?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?