IGI report LG760596922

2.01 ct Oval Laboratory-Grown Diamond

85/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

A 56.3% depth is shallow for an oval; check images for a see-through window in the centre.
Screening only: for this oval, check images or video of the exact stone for the bow-tie (a dark band across the centre) and whether both ends look even.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Ideal: At 58%, the table sits within the typical 53–63% range for an oval, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Closer look: 56.3% is shallower than typical for an oval (58–63.5%). That spreads the stone face-up but raises the risk of windowing — a glassy, see-through center.
Length-to-width · Ideal: A 1.44:1 outline is within the classic 1.3–1.5:1 range for an oval.
Polish · Favorable: Very Good polish is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Symmetry · Favorable: Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium to slightly thick (faceted): a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Favorable: G is near-colorless and faces up white in most settings, though an oval can show a hint of warmth at the tips.
Clarity · Favorable: VS1 is typically eye-clean.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

With a shallow 56.3% depth, can you see a glassy, see-through patch in the center?
In a face-up video, does the bow-tie flicker as the stone tilts, or stay a fixed dark band across the center?
Does this CVD diamond show any brown or gray undertone face-up in daylight?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?