IGI report LG756527774

2.55 ct Round Brilliant Laboratory-Grown Diamond

84/100 · Refined

A strong, composed candidate on paper.

What reads well

Crown 34° / pavilion 41.7° fall outside the pairing zone associated with strong light return.
Table 63% sits outside the preferred round range.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.
Not stated on the report: cut grade. This is not assumed to be favorable, and confidence is lower.

Table · Closer look: A 63% table is larger than typical for a round brilliant (53–59%). Large tables can read bright but flatter, with less fire and contrast.
Total depth · Closer look: 59.3% is shallower than typical for a round brilliant (59.5–63%). That spreads the stone face-up but raises the risk of windowing — a glassy, see-through center.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Ideal: Excellent symmetry is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium to slightly thick (faceted): a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Pointed: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Ideal: D is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Ideal: VVS2: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

With a shallow 59.3% depth, can you see a glassy, see-through patch in the center?
Does the large table look bright but flat, with less colored fire than you expected?
Does this CVD diamond show any brown or gray undertone face-up in daylight?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?