IGI report LG380912718

2.00 ct Emerald Laboratory-Grown Diamond

82/100 · Considered

A balanced profile with a few questions to carry forward.

What reads well

SI1 in an emerald cut: the open step-cut table makes inclusions easier to see. View an image or video of this exact stone.
Screening only: for this emerald cut, check images or video of the exact stone for the "hall of mirrors" step pattern, any see-through window under the table and clean corners.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.
Not stated on the report: depth. This is not assumed to be favorable, and confidence is lower.

Table · Ideal: At 67%, the table sits within the typical 60–69% range for an emerald cut, balancing brightness with fire.
Length-to-width · Ideal: A 1.34:1 outline is within the classic 1.3–1.5:1 range for an emerald cut.
Polish · Favorable: Very Good polish is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Symmetry · Favorable: Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Girdle · Ideal: Slightly thick to thick: a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: Long: a keel-line culet, normal for elongated step and modified cuts.
Color · Ideal: E is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Closer look: SI1 in a step cut often shows inclusions through the open table. Confirm eye-cleanliness with images or video.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

Step cuts show inclusions openly—is this SI1 diamond eye-clean through the table from about 10 inches away?
With Very Good polish and Very Good symmetry, are there visible misaligned facets or wheel marks?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?