HRD report 240000023965

2.20 ct Cushion Laboratory-Grown Diamond

84/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

A 1.61:1 length-to-width ratio is outside the classic cushion range; the outline will look more elongated than typical.
H color in a 2.20 ct cushion may show some warmth, especially at the corners.
Screening only: for this cushion, check images or video of the exact stone for the facet pattern (bold, chunky flashes or finer "crushed ice") and any dark areas under the table.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.

Table · Ideal: At 61%, the table sits within the typical 56–66% range for a cushion, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Ideal: 65.9% is within the typical 61–69% range for a cushion, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
Length-to-width · Favorable: A 1.61:1 outline is longer and slimmer than the classic 1–1.35:1 range for a cushion — a matter of taste, but worth seeing in person.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Favorable: Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium (faceted): a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Favorable: A linear culet is usually invisible to the eye.
Color · Favorable: H is near-colorless and faces up white in most settings.
Clarity · Favorable: VS1 is typically eye-clean.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

Does this cushion produce broad, chunky flashes or small needle-like crushed-ice sparkle?
With Very Good symmetry, are any facet junctions visibly misaligned?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?