GIA report 6551097631

2.00 ct Emerald Diamond

87/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

H color in a 2.00 ct emerald cut may show some warmth, especially at the corners.
VS2 in an emerald cut is usually eye-clean, but step cuts show inclusions more readily than brilliants; check the plot.
Screening only: for this emerald cut, check images or video of the exact stone for the "hall of mirrors" step pattern, any see-through window under the table and clean corners.

Table · Ideal: At 68%, the table sits within the typical 60–69% range for an emerald cut, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Ideal: 66% is within the typical 60–69% range for an emerald cut, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
Length-to-width · Ideal: A 1.43:1 outline is within the classic 1.3–1.5:1 range for an emerald cut.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Favorable: Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium to slightly thick, polished: a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: None: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Favorable: H is near-colorless and faces up white in most settings, though an emerald cut can show a hint of warmth at the corners.
Clarity · Favorable: VS2 is typically eye-clean, though step cuts show inclusions more readily — worth a close look at the images.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

Does the feather reach the outer edge where a setting prong could put pressure on it?
Step cuts show inclusions openly—is this VS2 diamond eye-clean through the table from about 10 inches away?
With Very Good symmetry, are any facet junctions visibly misaligned?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?