GIA report 6531106257
2.01 ct Oval Diamond
76/100 · Considered
A balanced profile with a few questions to carry forward.
What reads well
- A 1.36:1 length-to-width ratio sits in the classic oval range.
- No fluorescence: no haze risk to weigh.
What deserves a closer look
- Confirm this SI1 oval is eye-clean from an image or video; the report plot shows where inclusions sit.
- A 67.3% depth is on the deep side for an oval; deeper pavilions are associated with a stronger bow-tie and hidden weight.
- Very thick to extremely thick girdle: a thick girdle carries hidden weight and can reduce face-up size.
- Feathers are listed: check the plot for any that reach the girdle or surface, which matters for durability.
- Screening only: for this oval, check images or video of the exact stone for the bow-tie (a dark band across the centre) and whether both ends look even.
The reading, field by field
- Table · Ideal
- At 57%, the table sits within the typical 53–63% range for an oval, balancing brightness with fire.
- Total depth · Closer look
- 67.3% is deeper than typical for an oval (58–63.5%). Extra depth holds weight below the girdle, so the stone can face up smaller than its carat weight suggests and may show a stronger bow-tie.
- Length-to-width · Ideal
- A 1.36:1 outline is within the classic 1.3–1.5:1 range for an oval.
- Polish · Ideal
- Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
- Symmetry · Favorable
- Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
- Girdle · Closer look
- Very thick to extremely thick, faceted: a thick girdle carries weight in the rim, so the stone can face up a little smaller for its carat weight. It is durable, though.
- Culet · Ideal
- None: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
- Color · Favorable
- J may show slight warmth at the tips of an oval, especially next to white metal. Yellow or rose gold tends to complement it.
- Clarity · Favorable
- SI1 is often eye-clean in an oval, but not always — check where the inclusions sit.
- Fluorescence · Ideal
- None: no meaningful effect on appearance.
What to check on the exact stone
- With 67.3% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 2.01 ct oval?
- Does the feather reach the outer edge where a setting prong could put pressure on it?
- Is this SI1 diamond eye-clean face-up from about 10 inches away?
- Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?
Report facts
- Origin
- Natural
- Carat
- 2.01 ct
- Shape
- Oval
- Cut grade
- Not given for this shape
- Color
- J
- Clarity
- SI1
- Measurements
- 9.35 × 6.87 × 4.62 mm
- Table
- 57%
- Total depth
- 67.3%
- Crown angle
- Not given for this shape
- Pavilion angle
- Not given for this shape
- Polish
- Excellent
- Symmetry
- Very Good
- Girdle
- Very thick to extremely thick, faceted
- Culet
- None
- Fluorescence
- None