3.00 ct Pear Diamond

What reads well

• A 1.52:1 length-to-width ratio sits in the classic pear range.
• Face-up spread (11.97 × 7.86 mm) is typical or better for a 3.00 ct pear.
• D color is in the colorless range.
• IF clarity: inclusions are not a practical visual factor.
• No fluorescence: no haze risk to weigh.

What deserves a closer look

• Good polish / Good symmetry is below the Excellent/Very Good standard and can soften sparkle.
• A 65.9% depth is on the deep side for a pear; deeper pavilions are associated with a stronger bow-tie and hidden weight.
• Medium to extremely thick girdle: a thick girdle carries hidden weight and can reduce face-up size.
• Screening only: bow-tie, windowing and contrast in a pear can only be judged from images or video of this exact stone.

What to check on the exact stone

• With 65.9% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 3.00 ct pear?
• Will the ring setting use a protective V-tip prong or bezel to safeguard the delicate point?
• Is extra carat weight trapped in the thick girdle rim where it does not add finger presence?
• With Good polish and Good symmetry, are there visible misaligned facets or wheel marks?

Report facts

Origin

Natural

Carat

3.00 ct

Shape

Pear

Color

D

Clarity

IF

Cut

Not stated

Measurements

11.97 × 7.86 × 5.18 mm

Table

56%

Depth

65.9%

Crown angle

Not stated

Pavilion angle

Not stated

Girdle

Medium to extremely thick, faceted

Culet

None

Polish

Good

Symmetry

Good

Fluorescence

None