1.00 ct Pear Diamond

What reads well

• A 1.62:1 length-to-width ratio sits in the classic pear range.
• Face-up spread (8.65 × 5.33 mm) is typical or better for a 1.00 ct pear.
• Excellent polish and symmetry, the top finish grades.
• G color should face up white in most settings.
• VVS2 clarity: inclusions are not a practical visual factor.

What deserves a closer look

• A 65.1% depth is on the deep side for a pear; deeper pavilions are associated with a stronger bow-tie and hidden weight.
• Thick to very thick girdle: a thick girdle carries hidden weight and can reduce face-up size (thicker points are common in fancy shapes).
• Screening only: bow-tie, windowing and contrast in a pear can only be judged from images or video of this exact stone.

What to check on the exact stone

• With 65.1% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 1.00 ct pear?
• Will the ring setting use a protective V-tip prong or bezel to safeguard the delicate point?
• Is extra carat weight trapped in the thick girdle rim where it does not add finger presence?
• Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?

Report facts

Origin

Natural

Carat

1.00 ct

Shape

Pear

Color

G

Clarity

VVS2

Cut

Not stated

Measurements

8.65 × 5.33 × 3.47 mm

Table

62%

Depth

65.1%

Crown angle

Not stated

Pavilion angle

Not stated

Girdle

Thick to very thick, faceted

Culet

None

Polish

Excellent

Symmetry

Excellent

Fluorescence

Medium Blue