GIA report 2544697502

4.00 ct Cushion Diamond

84/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

Excellent polish / Good symmetry is below the Excellent/Very Good standard and can soften sparkle.
Thick to extremely thick girdle: a thick girdle carries hidden weight and can reduce face-up size.
Screening only: for this cushion, check images or video of the exact stone for the facet pattern (bold, chunky flashes or finer "crushed ice") and any dark areas under the table.

Table · Closer look: A 67% table is larger than typical for a cushion (56–66%). Large tables can read bright but flatter, with less fire and contrast.
Total depth · Ideal: 67.5% is within the typical 61–69% range for a cushion, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
Length-to-width · Ideal: A 1.32:1 outline is within the classic 1–1.35:1 range for a cushion.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Closer look: Good symmetry is below the grades most buyers target and can slightly soften crispness. Worth seeing the stone in person or on video.
Girdle · Closer look: Thick to extremely thick, faceted: a thick girdle carries weight in the rim, so the stone can face up a little smaller for its carat weight. It is durable, though.
Culet · Ideal: None: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Favorable: G is near-colorless and faces up white in most settings.
Clarity · Ideal: VVS2: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.
Fluorescence · Ideal: Faint: no meaningful effect on appearance.

Does the large table look bright but flat, with less colored fire than you expected?
Does the feather reach the outer edge where a setting prong could put pressure on it?
Does this cushion produce broad, chunky flashes or small needle-like crushed-ice sparkle?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?