1.50 ct Emerald Diamond

What reads well

• A 1.34:1 length-to-width ratio sits in the classic emerald cut range.
• Face-up spread (7.26 × 5.43 mm) is typical or better for a 1.50 ct emerald cut.
• G color should face up white in most settings.
• No fluorescence: no haze risk to weigh.

What deserves a closer look

• Surface-reaching characteristics are listed (cavity); check their position on the plot for durability.
• Thick to very thick girdle: a thick girdle carries hidden weight and can reduce face-up size (thicker points are common in fancy shapes).
• The report notes internal graining; these can soften transparency in some stones.
• Screening only: for this emerald cut, check images or video of the exact stone for the "hall of mirrors" step pattern, any see-through window under the table and clean corners.

The reading, field by field

Table · Ideal

At 64%, the table sits within the typical 60–69% range for an emerald cut, balancing brightness with fire.

Total depth · Closer look

69.3% is deeper than typical for an emerald cut (60–69%). Extra depth holds weight below the girdle, so the stone can face up smaller than its carat weight suggests.

Length-to-width · Ideal

A 1.34:1 outline is within the classic 1.3–1.5:1 range for an emerald cut.

Polish · Favorable

Very Good polish is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.

Symmetry · Favorable

Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.

Girdle · Closer look

Thick to very thick, polished: a thick girdle carries weight in the rim, so the stone can face up a little smaller for its carat weight. It is durable, though.

Culet · Ideal

None: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.

Color · Favorable

G is near-colorless and faces up white in most settings, though an emerald cut can show a hint of warmth at the corners.

Clarity · Ideal

VVS2: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.

Fluorescence · Ideal

None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

What to check on the exact stone

• With 69.3% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 1.50 ct emerald?
• Is the surface opening protected by a prong, or could it catch lint and risk chipping?
• With open step facets, is the center completely eye-clean without any visible dark marks?
• Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?

Report facts

Origin

Natural

Carat

1.50 ct

Shape

Emerald

Cut grade

Not given for this shape

Color

G

Clarity

VVS2

Measurements

7.26 × 5.43 × 3.77 mm

Table

64%

Total depth

69.3%

Crown angle

Not given for this shape

Pavilion angle

Not given for this shape

Polish

Very Good

Symmetry

Very Good

Girdle

Thick to very thick, polished

Culet

None

Fluorescence

None