GIA report 2526009104
1.50 ct Round Brilliant Diamond
51/100 · Investigate
The report asks for a more careful visual review.
What reads well
- VVS2 clarity: inclusions are not a practical visual factor.
- I color in a round brilliant usually faces up near-colorless once set.
- Faint fluorescence: no haze risk to weigh.
What deserves a closer look
- The GIA cut grade is Good: the lab's own assessment points to less brightness and fire than its top tier.
- Crown 40° / pavilion 39.6° fall outside the pairing zone associated with strong light return.
- Depth 66.6% sits outside the preferred round range.
- Very thick girdle: a thick girdle carries hidden weight and can reduce face-up size.
- The diameter is small for 1.50 ct: weight is carried below the girdle rather than face-up.
The reading, field by field
- Table · Ideal
- At 58%, the table sits within the typical 53–59% range for a round brilliant, balancing brightness with fire.
- Total depth · Closer look
- 66.6% is deeper than typical for a round brilliant (59.5–63%). Extra depth holds weight below the girdle, so the stone can face up smaller than its carat weight suggests.
- Crown angle · Closer look
- A 40° crown is steeper than the typical 32–36° zone. Steep crowns can add fire, but only pair well with a slightly shallower pavilion.
- Pavilion angle · Closer look
- 39.6° is shallower than the narrow 40.5–41.3° zone. Shallow pavilions can let light pass straight through, looking glassy.
- Polish · Favorable
- Very Good polish is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
- Symmetry · Favorable
- Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
- Girdle · Closer look
- Very thick, faceted, 7.0%: a thick girdle carries weight in the rim, so the stone can face up a little smaller for its carat weight. It is durable, though.
- Culet · Ideal
- None: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
- Color · Favorable
- I may show slight warmth, especially next to white metal. Yellow or rose gold tends to complement it.
- Clarity · Ideal
- VVS2: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.
- Fluorescence · Ideal
- Faint: no meaningful effect on appearance.
- Cut grade · Closer look
- Good as issued by GIA, on GIA's own scale. The measured proportions above tell you more than the label.
What to check on the exact stone
- Does a gray ring or glassy patch show around the center when you look straight down?
- With 66.6% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 1.50 ct round?
- Does the feather reach the outer edge where a setting prong could put pressure on it?
- Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?
Report facts
- Origin
- Natural
- Carat
- 1.50 ct
- Shape
- Round Brilliant
- Cut grade
- Good (GIA)
- Color
- I
- Clarity
- VVS2
- Measurements
- 6.90–6.97 × 4.62 mm
- Table
- 58%
- Total depth
- 66.6%
- Crown angle
- 40°
- Pavilion angle
- 39.6°
- Polish
- Very Good
- Symmetry
- Very Good
- Girdle
- Very thick, faceted, 7.0%
- Culet
- None
- Fluorescence
- Faint