GIA report 2427760401
2.00 ct Oval Diamond
76/100 · Considered
A balanced profile with a few questions to carry forward.
What reads well
- Face-up spread (10.74 × 6.85 mm) is typical or better for a 2.00 ct oval.
- No fluorescence: no haze risk to weigh.
What deserves a closer look
- A 1.57:1 length-to-width ratio is outside the classic oval range; the outline will look more elongated than typical.
- The table 65% sits outside the typical oval range.
- Clouds are referenced on the report; confirm the stone looks transparent rather than hazy.
- Confirm this SI1 oval is eye-clean from an image or video; the report plot shows where inclusions sit.
- Screening only: for this oval, check images or video of the exact stone for the bow-tie (a dark band across the centre) and whether both ends look even.
The reading, field by field
- Table · Closer look
- A 65% table is larger than typical for an oval (53–63%). Large tables can read bright but flatter, with less fire and contrast.
- Total depth · Ideal
- 60.2% is within the typical 58–63.5% range for an oval, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
- Length-to-width · Favorable
- A 1.57:1 outline is longer and slimmer than the classic 1.3–1.5:1 range for an oval — a matter of taste, but worth seeing in person.
- Polish · Ideal
- Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
- Symmetry · Favorable
- Very Good symmetry is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
- Girdle · Closer look
- Thin to extremely thick, faceted: a thick girdle carries weight in the rim, so the stone can face up a little smaller for its carat weight. It is durable, though.
- Culet · Ideal
- None: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
- Color · Closer look
- K shows visible warmth. It suits buyers who like a softer, warmer look, and pairs best with yellow or rose gold.
- Clarity · Favorable
- SI1 is often eye-clean in an oval, but not always — check where the inclusions sit.
- Fluorescence · Ideal
- None: no meaningful effect on appearance.
What to check on the exact stone
- Does the large table look bright but flat, with less colored fire than you expected?
- Does the diamond look crisp and transparent in natural light, or is there any milky haze?
- Does the feather reach the outer edge where a setting prong could put pressure on it?
- Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?
Report facts
- Origin
- Natural
- Carat
- 2.00 ct
- Shape
- Oval
- Cut grade
- Not given for this shape
- Color
- K
- Clarity
- SI1
- Measurements
- 10.74 × 6.85 × 4.12 mm
- Table
- 65%
- Total depth
- 60.2%
- Crown angle
- Not given for this shape
- Pavilion angle
- Not given for this shape
- Polish
- Excellent
- Symmetry
- Very Good
- Girdle
- Thin to extremely thick, faceted
- Culet
- None
- Fluorescence
- None