GIA report 1323678673

1.20 ct Round Brilliant Diamond

79/100 · Considered

A balanced profile with a few questions to carry forward.

What reads well

SI2 is often not eye-clean in a round brilliant; view an image or video of this exact stone.
Crown 34° / pavilion 41.8° fall outside the pairing zone associated with strong light return.
Clouds are referenced on the report; confirm the stone looks transparent rather than hazy.

Table · Ideal: At 59%, the table sits within the typical 53–59% range for a round brilliant, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Ideal: 62.8% is within the typical 59.5–63% range for a round brilliant, keeping weight where it contributes to face-up size and light return.
Crown angle · Ideal: 34° sits in the 32–36° zone where crown angles typically balance fire and brightness.
Pavilion angle · Closer look: 41.8° is steeper than the narrow 40.5–41.3° zone. Deep pavilions can leak light through the sides and darken the center.
Polish · Ideal: Excellent polish is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Symmetry · Ideal: Excellent symmetry is the top finish grade — facets are cleanly executed with nothing that would soften sparkle.
Girdle · Ideal: Medium to slightly thick, faceted, 4.0%: a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: None: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Favorable: G is near-colorless and faces up white in most settings.
Clarity · Closer look: SI2: inclusions may be visible to the eye. Confirm with images or video before buying.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.
Cut grade · Ideal: Excellent as issued by GIA, on GIA's own scale. The measured proportions above tell you more than the label.

Does the center turn dark or lose sparkle when you tilt the diamond face-up?
Does the diamond look crisp and transparent in natural light, or is there any milky haze?
Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?