GIA report 12914968
3.00 ct Radiant Diamond
54/100 · Investigate
The report asks for a more careful visual review.
What reads well
- A 1.29:1 length-to-width ratio sits in the classic radiant range.
- No fluorescence: no haze risk to weigh.
What deserves a closer look
- The table 72% and depth 80.3% sit outside the typical radiant range.
- Face-up area is about 18% below typical radiants of this weight, suggesting hidden weight in depth.
- Very Good polish / Good symmetry is below the Excellent/Very Good standard and can soften sparkle.
- Extremely thin to extremely thick girdle: a very thin edge raises chipping risk.
- Screening only: for this radiant, check images or video of the exact stone for the sparkle pattern (defined flashes or "crushed ice") and any dark or see-through corners.
The reading, field by field
- Table · Closer look
- A 72% table is larger than typical for a radiant (60–70%). Large tables can read bright but flatter, with less fire and contrast.
- Total depth · Closer look
- 80.3% is deeper than typical for a radiant (61–68%). Extra depth holds weight below the girdle, so the stone can face up smaller than its carat weight suggests.
- Length-to-width · Ideal
- A 1.29:1 outline is within the classic 1.2–1.5:1 range for a radiant.
- Polish · Favorable
- Very Good polish is a fine result; the difference from Excellent is rarely visible without magnification.
- Symmetry · Closer look
- Good symmetry is below the grades most buyers target and can slightly soften crispness. Worth seeing the stone in person or on video.
- Girdle · Closer look
- Extremely thin to extremely thick: thin sections of girdle are more vulnerable to chipping. A setting that protects the edge is sensible.
- Culet · Ideal
- None: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
- Color · Favorable
- G is near-colorless and faces up white in most settings, though a radiant can show a hint of warmth at the corners.
- Clarity · Ideal
- VVS1: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.
- Fluorescence · Ideal
- None: no meaningful effect on appearance.
What to check on the exact stone
- With 80.3% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 3.00 ct radiant?
- Does the large table look bright but flat, with less colored fire than you expected?
- Does the feather reach the outer edge where a setting prong could put pressure on it?
- Can you show me the inscribed report number under a loupe before it is set?
Report facts
- Origin
- Natural
- Carat
- 3.00 ct
- Shape
- Radiant
- Cut grade
- Not given for this shape
- Color
- G
- Clarity
- VVS1
- Measurements
- 8.64 × 6.71 × 5.39 mm
- Table
- 72%
- Total depth
- 80.3%
- Crown angle
- Not given for this shape
- Pavilion angle
- Not given for this shape
- Polish
- Very Good
- Symmetry
- Good
- Girdle
- Extremely thin to extremely thick
- Culet
- None
- Fluorescence
- None