GCAL report 360886142

3.73 ct Radiant Laboratory-Grown Diamond

89/100 · Refined

A strong candidate on paper; confirm its light pattern in imagery.

What reads well

Screening only: for this radiant, check images or video of the exact stone for the sparkle pattern (defined flashes or "crushed ice") and any dark or see-through corners.
Treatment status is not stated on the report. For a laboratory-grown diamond, ask whether it is as-grown or post-growth treated.
Not stated on the report: polish, symmetry. These are not assumed to be favorable, and confidence is lower.

Table · Ideal: At 66%, the table sits within the typical 60–70% range for a radiant, balancing brightness with fire.
Total depth · Closer look: 68.1% is deeper than typical for a radiant (61–68%). Extra depth holds weight below the girdle, so the stone can face up smaller than its carat weight suggests.
Length-to-width · Ideal: A 1.47:1 outline is within the classic 1.2–1.5:1 range for a radiant.
Girdle · Ideal: Sl. thick: a durable girdle thickness that doesn't hide meaningful weight.
Culet · Ideal: None: no visible culet facet when viewed face-up.
Color · Ideal: D is in the colorless range and faces up white in any metal.
Clarity · Ideal: VVS1: inclusions, if any, are only visible under magnification.
Fluorescence · Ideal: None: no meaningful effect on appearance.

With 68.1% depth, does this stone face up smaller than a typical 3.73 ct radiant?
Can you confirm the stone's weight and measurements match the GCAL report before it is set?